Posted by: Mon Casiple | December 1, 2007

An attempt to checkmate or a “God save the Queen” scenario?

Senator Trillanes and Gen. Danny Lim declared a “withdrawal of support” from the Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo administration and has called on the armed forces and the people to do likewise. An Oakwood-type drama was conducted in the Manila Peninsula Hotel in Makati. It failed after six hours when the government forces assaulted the hotel and those inside surrendered. The rest are on the run and the government is running after them. The situation has returned to “normal” and the president is off to Europe. All’s well that ends well?

Oakwood has now come a full circle. However, the political context of the present Manila Pen is different than the one in 2003. Then, GMA was at the height of her power, with a comfortable positive public opinion, the support of the majority of the middle class, and with considerable international goodwill. Now, she is facing an increasingly lameduck presidency, a deep distrust of her government among significant sectors, including the middle class, and buffeted by accusations of human rights violations abroad.

The country has entered the period of the transition to the post-GMA political situation. The immediate struggle revolves around the question of who will manage this transition. Logically in our democracy, the president–holding the reins of power–presides over this transition. However, in GMA’s case, this is forfeit because of her political weaknesses.

The Manila Pen incident follows closely on the heels of dramatic and violent events such as the Batasan bombing. A case can be made that incidents such as these fit into the present context of the political transition. Including nonviolent political events such as the LP and NP mediamatic non-proclamation of presidential candidacies, these collectively affirm that relevant political forces in the Philippines are on the march and are staking out their various positions.

I do not think the Manila Pen incident itself meant the end of the military rebels’ own plans; it may be the beginning. However, a much more interesting possibility is the use of their movement for political maneuvering vis-a-vis the contest for the role of transition manager.

On hindsight, what Senator Trillanes and company did in Manila Pen was either a stupid and unrealistic bid for a people-powered downfall of the GMA administration or a brilliant probing attack in a much more complicated strategy. There were simply many disconnects in the event that prevented the achievement of the announced objective to topple the current power in Malacañang. Firstly, there was no evident pre-synchronization of various potential or actual sympathetic forces. Secondly, there was no provision–either in warm bodies or logistics–for a long-drawn siege. It seems, they want to end the drama as it actually did–when the government forces started its counterattack in earnest. Thirdly, there were no observable mobilization of sympathetic military forces beyond the small group that accompanied Senator Trillanes to the Manila Pen. AFP chief of staff Hermogenes Esperon’s assertion of having prevented this from happening cannot simply be be taken at face value given the extent of discontent and ferment in the camps (as shown in the Trillanes protest vote in the last elections).

What the Manila Pen incident accomplished is to underscore the vulnerability of Malacañang and its unavoidable dependence on the support of the armed forces. Its initial reaction to the incident had been an ostensibly panicky one with a wide-ranging set of tactics that included the arrest of aging vice-president Guingona and retired bishop Labayen, as well as the arrest of covering press people, a dramatic and violent–if uncalled for–assault on Manila Pen, and a blanket curfew. These latter tactics immediately drew condemnations from the middle class, business and tourist community, the Catholic church and the mass media. They can only exacerbate the isolation of the GMA administration.

Its very political survival is now held hostage by the military sector. If a “God save the Queen” scenario is the one in the works, Manila Pen put the last pieces in position for a decisive move.


Responses

  1. Minister of Popular Enlightenment and Propaganda

    * Puno said they even tried to call the act something else as curfew might not have traumatic effect on the people, who could associate it to the curfew imposed during the Martial Law era.

    * “Iyong sinabi niyo nga na pag sinabing curfew maaalala martial law talaga. So nag-iisip kami, pwede bang gumamit ng ibang salita? Para hindi naman magkaroon ng traumatic effect sa ating mga kababayan. Eh wala naman talagang maisip. So sabi namin tutal iilang oras iyan… (We could not think of any other name to call it so we decide to stick on curfew anyway it’s only for a few hours).”

    * “Technically that is not an arrest(i.e.,mass arrests and handcuffing of journalists covering the Trillanes story). That is a processing,” Interior and Local Government Secretary Ronaldo Puno said.

    “Oh Mortal Man, is there nothing you cannot be made to believe?Josef Goebbel, Minister of Popular Enlightenment and Propaganda

  2. Mr Casiple, your comments are one fo the best ones I’ve read ! You’re good.

  3. In my quest to make sense of it all, I chanced upon an ABS-CBN Dec 5 2005 article on its web (http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/topofthehour.aspx?StoryId=24803), where Marine Capt Nicanor Faeldon escaped “during a commotion at the Makati City regional Trial Court’s parking lot.” This struck me. The episode was almost 2 years ago. Its too damn coincidental that Capt Faeldon was able to escape again.

  4. [...] Casiple dissects the coup incident: “What the Manila Pen incident accomplished is to underscore the vulnerability [...]

  5. [...] Casiple’s “An attempt to checkmate or a ‘Save-the-Queen’ scenario” Related [...]

  6. Mr Casiple, you may have hit the nail to an enigma. These PMa-ers are strategists to the core and even Lao Tzu’s Art of War is filled with paradoxes on how to win over the enemy! Thank you very much!

  7. Excellent!

  8. And Capt Faeldon is nowhere to be found… the knight that will slaughter the bishop perhaps?

  9. [...] suicide, but also, that the administration’s proven itself incorrigible. In his blog, Mon Casiple points out something interesting: Oakwood has now come a full circle. However, the political [...]

  10. [...] a very chilling and already very evident observation from Mon Casiple: On hindsight, what Senator Trillanes and company did in Manila Pen was either a stupid and [...]

  11. Dear Mon:

    Interesting analysis, especially the last part concerning a possible “God Save the Queen” scenario.

    What I’m wondering, however, is this: IF, as you said, “Manila Pen put the last pieces in position for a decisive move,” the question is FOR WHOM? Who stands to gain, or who stands to benefit from such a ‘decisive move’ – whatever it may be?

    I wholly agree with your observation that this latest incident (or ‘caper’) simply highlights the insecurity of the GMA administration, as well as further emphasizing the reality of the political administration being increasingly held ‘hostage’ by the military establishment. But then, *who* is the one doing the hostaging?

    I keep asking myself, after reading your blog, just what was the Manila Pen incident in aid of? The only way I see it as playing into a “God Save the Queen” scenario is if Trillanes, et.al., are trying a ‘death of a thousand cuts’ approach on GMA – harassing and poking at the government until such time as the government gets fed up and launches an ‘all out campaign’ by declaring martial law and unleashing the military dogs against any and all opposition – civilian, military, leftist, rightist, centrist, Erap and his family, etc.

    This assumes that the civilians in government (Puno, the two Gonzalezes, and others) do not see themselves as being held hostage by the military but that they are ‘in control’ and can do whatever they want without fear of reprisal from any corner – except perhaps the barrage of saliva from ‘opposition’ politicians and blog posts from the thinking few like you.

    (Come to think about it, why not? They’ve been getting away with murder – literally – as well as stealing the economy blind as they keep dipping into the National Treasury for the moola needed to keep the lackeys happy as seen by the Congressional and local government throngs at the Malacanang cash bar.)

    If this is the case … what comes after? Assume that the scenario calls for just such a thing to happen – Trillanes, et. al. are able to push the insecurity buttons of this administration to the point that they attempt a martial law-style takeover in order to perpetuate “Queen Gloria’s” rule beyond 2010.

    If such a scenario takes place, it is possible that the first move of the civilian gauteliers and their military cohorts (especially Esperon) will be to haul Trillanes et. al before the wall … and if such a thing does happen, it will be done in full view of a mass of usiseros lustfully cheering the firing squad on.

    The problem with such a scenario, however, is that the Queen and her cohorts don’t need to go to that extent – as noted, the culture of impunity that they’ve put into place allows them to get away with murder, literally and figuratively. Why declare martial law when they are already getting away with it?

    Personally, I don’t see anything complicated behind the Manila Pen incident. I cannot help but see it as a straightforward case of a few good men (Lim, Trillanes, et al) getting fed up and mounting a spontaneous protest action which – unfortunately – is getting either romanticized or demonized, depending on where one sits.

    A friend notes that Trillanes at the Pen seemed … ‘disconnected’, to use your term: mouthing motherhood statements, falling back on rhetoric, obviously caught unprepared and with no real plan. Th downside of his actions was to show to all and sundry “hindi na siya nag-mature.”

    But then the same comment is applicable to GMA and her lackeys, as well as the military or police ground commanders whose actions were, as pundits point out, “OA masyado.” Hindi na rin sila nag-mature … it was more a case of “boys with their toys” putting on a show for the cameras. The way I see it, they (the police) should have simply marched into the hotel behind their armored vests and toting their weapons and served Trillanes and Lim with warrants of arrest and taken them in – not go whole hog with their APC and guns blazing.

    For most people, what happened at the Manila Pen was nothing more than a momentary blip in their daily struggle for survival. To some extent, I have to agree with the pundits who point out that the people are fed up with extra-constitutional means of changing the government – EDSA I and II were met with the hope of major changes for the better in their lives; unfortunately, all the promises and dreams were dashed as the venal nature of people took over and the ordinary Filipino got shafted by the ‘leaders.’

    On the one hand, I sympathize with Trillanes and Lim. And I totally agree with General Lim’s statement that “Dissent without action is consent.” They’ve expressed their dissent through action several times and I respect them for that.

    Beyond that, however, they have shown very little in the way of creativity or even strategic thinking. To a large extent, they’re proving to be people shaped by their milieu – they are soldiers with a very limited, *tactical* appreciation of their environment which is why I cannot help but think that they continue to fail.

    The sad thing, to my mind, is that they’ve allowed themselves to be locked into a very narrow field of perception and action – as my friend said earlier, “Di na sila nag-mature.”

    Trillanes’ move to run for Senator was, to my mind at the time, a brilliant move that was totally ‘outside the box.’ Unfortunately, it seems that he has been unable to move beyond his victory, allowing himself to be mired in the arcane legalities of ‘military justice’ when – for all intents and purposes – he should now be considered a *civilian* who can – and should have – demanded for access to media to speak out and air his views. Or, given the way the government has been subverting his access, he could have tried getting his views out in other ways, in the same way that martial law detainees have done so before.

    But no – he keeps following the ‘narrow’ perspectives and approaches that appear to have shaped his life and his mind – this latest incident seems to indicate that he is unable to fathom an approach outside the ’straight and narrow.’

    Sayang.

    Sana mag-mature na siya.

    More power to you.

    MonC: Hi, Gil. The question of “who” is a bit difficult to answer definitively unless you’re an insider due to the abundance of the usual suspects. What is a definite possibility is the use of the incident to further a “save the Queen” scenario. I also did not intend to say that this scenario literally aims at “saving” the queen. The use of this term in our recent past (the coup attempts of the late 80s) denotes a hostaged one subject to dictates of the “savior.” This assumes a subversion of the ruler’s power from within or from outside but, in any case, retaining the ruler as a figurehead. This scenario has the inherent threat of removal from power that can easily develop into an actual act of removal.

  12. [...] An attempt to checkmate or “God save the queen scenario”?http://moncasiple.wordpress.com/2007/12/01/an-attempt-to-checkmate-or-a-god-save-the-queen-scenario/ [...]


Leave a response

Your response:

Categories